||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 161 (Jun)
||Queen's Bench Division
||Jonathan Ferris (instructed by Naser Taher, China) for the claimants.
||Lawrence Emmett (instructed by CMS Cameron McKenna) for the defendants.
||12 June 2008
Evidence - Mode of giving evidence - Video-link - Fourth claimant resident abroad - Fourth claimant having adverse costs order made against him - Fourth claimant not wishing to enter United Kingdom on basis of possible petition for bankruptcy and thus applying for use of video conference facility - Whether judge should order use of facility.
An application by the fourth claimant, who was resident in China, for the use of a video conference facility in committal proceedings was allowed. The position of the fourth claimant was an unattractive one, where he had sought to take advantage of a modern facility, but was unwilling to dispose himself in the United Kingdom to the consequences of disbelief. However, the adoption of a deeply unattractive position was not a good reason for denying him a modern fair trial.
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports