||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 345 (Jun)
||Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court
Moses LJ and Goldring J
||John Edwards (instructed by Swaffields) for the appellant.
||Tim Green (instructed by Vanessa Brown) for the authority.
||25 June 2008
Criminal law - Trial - Plea - Guilty - Contravention of tree preservation order - Appellant applying to change plea - Judge refusing to allow change of plea - Whether judge erring.
Criminal law Trial. In criminal proceedings where the appellant pleaded guilty cutting down eleven trees protected by a tree preservation order, contrary to s210(1) of the but subsequently applied to change his plea on the basis of advice he had received from a tree surgeon, the judge had erred in making his decision to refuse the appellant permission to change his plea, based solely on the potentially mistaken evidence as to when the tree surgeon's advice had been given. The matter would be remitted to the Crown Court to determine whether the appellant's plea had been equivocal or not.
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports