||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 64 (Jan)
||Court of Justice of the European Communities (Third Chamber)
Judges Rosas (President), Cunha Rodrigues, Klucka (Rapporteur), O Caoimh and Lindh
||17 January 2008
European Community - Exports - Export refunds - Protection of bovine animals during transport - Payment of export refunds for bovine animals - Proportionality - Forfeiture of export refunds - Council Directive (EC) 91/628 - Commission Regulation (EC) 615/98.
Where two companies had submitted a declaration to the customs office covering the export of live bovine animals to certain countries, both applications were rejected, as part of the Annex to Council Directive (EC) 91-628 (on the protection of animals during transport) had not been complied with. No doubt could be cast on the validity of art1 of Commission Regulation615-98 (EC) (laying down specific detailed rules of application for the export refund arrangements as regards the welfare of live bovine animals during transport); and moreover, no doubt could be cast on the validity of art5(3) of reg615-98 in the light of the principle of proportionality. It was for the finance court to assess whether the competent authorities had applied the relevant provisions of reg615-98 in a manner that was consonant with that principle.
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports