||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 68 (Jan)
||Chancery Division, Patents Court
||Michael Silverleaf QC (instructed by Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer) for the claimant.
||Guy Burkill QC (instructed by Lovells) for the defendant.
||17 January 2008
Disclosure and inspection of documents - Production of documents - Company documents - Company contending that it had no obligation to disclose group companies' documents - Whether documents were in company's control.
The defendant's application for the disclosure of documents relating to the claimant company's case that its patents for controlled sonar electromagnetic surveying equipment were invalid, on the basis of obviousness and a lack of an inventive step, was allowed as the documents that were sought could be considered to be in the claimants control as it had the general consent of the companies within its group to search through and disclose relevant documents.
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports