||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 14 (Jan)
||Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court
||Paul Greatorex (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State.
||Jacques Rene (instructed by S J Solicitors) for the claimant.
||14 January 2008
Immigration - Leave for indefinite stay - Dependent parents - Claimant applying for indefinite leave to remain on basis of financial dependency - Secretary of State refusing application - Whether Secretary of State erring.
In the instant case, the Secretary of State had not erred in refusing the claimant's application for indefinite leave to remain upon the basis of financial dependency, where his sister and her daughter, who had arrived in the United Kingdom at a subsequent date, had asserted that the claimant had taken financial responsibility for them. The instant case was not one where a person had cared for a child because the child had no other carer. The fact that the claimant's sister and niece had chosen to live with him had not necessitated any element of dependency.
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports