||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 223 (Jan)
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Buxton, Hooper and Hallett LJJ
||Mohammed Hay (instructed by Chase Christopher Roberts) for the appellants.
||Charles Bourne (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State.
||29 January 2008
Immigration - Leave to remain - Leave to remain as child of parent, parents or relatives present and settled in United Kingdom - Relative - Immigration judge finding that appellants failing to establish asserted relationship with 'relative' - Whether judge in error - Immigration Rules, r 298(i).
In all the circumstances, an immigration judge had been entitled to conclude on the evidence before him that third parties were not 'relatives' of the appellants so as to entitle the latter to indefinite leave to remain under r298(i)(d) of the Immigration Rules.
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports