Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2008] All ER (D) 06 (Jan)
Court: Queen's Bench Division, Divisional Court
Judge:

Latham LJ and Cooke J

Representation Matthew Morgan (instructed by Osborne Bake Woodley, Colchester) for the appellants.
  Richard Kelly (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service, Essex) for the respondent.
Judgment Dates: 14 January 2008

Catchwords

Criminal law - Harassment - Course of conduct - Appellants convicted of harassment - Whether requisite course of conduct for harassment - , 2.

The Case

In the instant case, the judge had not erred in convicting the appellants of harassment under s2 of the . The conduct in the period in question could not be regarded as one continuous episode of intimidation; rather, there had been a number of distinct episodes which amounted to the requisite 'course of conduct'.

Practice Areas

If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.