||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 06 (Jan)
||Queen's Bench Division, Divisional Court
Latham LJ and Cooke J
||Matthew Morgan (instructed by Osborne Bake Woodley, Colchester) for the appellants.
||Richard Kelly (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service, Essex) for the respondent.
||14 January 2008
Criminal law - Harassment - Course of conduct - Appellants convicted of harassment - Whether requisite course of conduct for harassment - , 2.
In the instant case, the judge had not erred in convicting the appellants of harassment under s2 of the . The conduct in the period in question could not be regarded as one continuous episode of intimidation; rather, there had been a number of distinct episodes which amounted to the requisite 'course of conduct'.
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports