||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 01 (Jun)
||Court of Justice of the European Communities (Grand Chamber)
Judges Jann (President of the First Chamber, acting as President), Timmermans, Rosas, Schintgen, Klucka (Presidents of Chambers), Cunha Rodrigues, Silva de Lapuerta, Ilesic, Malenovsky (Rapporteur), Lohmus, O Caoimh and Bay Larsen
||5 June 2007
European community - Freedom of movement - Goods - National provisions prohibiting importation of alcoholic beverages by private individuals - Rule relating to existence and operation of monopoly on sales of alcoholic beverages - Assessment - Whether measure contrary to Community law - Whether justified on ground of protection of health and life of humans - EC Treaty, arts 28, 30, 31.
European community Freedom of movement. A national provision under which private individuals were prohibited from importing alcoholic beverages had to be assessed in the light of art28 of the EC Treaty and not in the light of art31 EC. A measure under which private individuals were prohibited from importing alcoholic beverages amounted to a quantitative restriction on imports within the meaning of art28 EC, even though that law required the holder of the retail sale monopoly, on request, to supply and therefore, if necessary, to import the beverages in question. A measure under which private individuals were prohibited from importing alcoholic beverages, as it was unsuitable for attaining the objective of limiting alcohol consumption generally, and as it was not proportionate for attaining the objective of protecting young persons against the harmful effects of such consumption, could not be regarded as being justified under art30 EC on grounds of protection of the health and life of humans.
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary