||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 22 (Aug)
|| EWCA Crim 1450
||Court of Appeal, Criminal Division
Burton and Flaux JJ
||Barnaby Shaw (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the defendant.
||8 June 2007
Sentence - Imprisonment - Length of sentence - Burglary - Whether sentence manifestly excessive in light of disparity with that of co-accused.
Sentence Imprisonment. Where the defendant, who had pleaded guilty to a count of burglary, with one other offence being taken into consideration, appealed against a sentence of 18 months' imprisonment on the basis of disparity with the sentence of the co-defendant, who received a suspended sentence of 51 weeks' imprisonment, the appeal was allowed. The difference between the defendant and the co-defendant was too much for right-thinking members of the public to stomach in terms of assessing the justifiability of the disparity. In those circumstances, the instant case was one where, on the grounds of disparity alone, the court could and should interfere.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary