||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 79 (Jun)
|| EWHC 1312 (Admin)
||Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
||Michael Beloff QC and Tim Ward (instructed by Lovells LLP) for the claimants.
||Mark Hoskins and Maya Lester (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the defendant.
||Dinah Rose QC (instructed by Baker & McKenzie LLP) for the interested parties.
||11 June 2007
Gaming - Lawful and unlawful gaming - Casinos - Transitional provisions under Gaming Act 2005 - Provisions not dealing with existing and new casinos on equal basis - Whether provisions lawful - (Commencement No 6 and Transitional Provisions) Order 2006 (), Sch 4, para 65.
Gaming Lawful and unlawful gaming. The claimant casino owners' challenge to transitional provisions introduced by the defendant Secretary of State concerning new and existing casinos, under the Gaming Act 2005, was dismissed. The impugned provision (para65 of Sch4 to the (Commencement No 6 and Transitional Provisions) Order 2006, ) had been validly made.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary