||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 330 (Jun)
||Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
Judge Peter Coulson QC
||Christopher Coney (instructed by Thackray Williams, Bromely) for the claimants.
||Paul Letman (instructed by Finers Stephens Innocent) for the defendant.
||27 June 2007
Building contract - Damages for breach - Mitigation of loss - Claimants discovering defects in house purchased from defendant - Claimants' surveyor objecting to remedial work proposed by defendant - Claimants refusing defendant's offer for surveyors to meet - Claimants bringing proceedings for breach of contract - Whether claimants failing to mitigate losses by refusing defendant's offers - Whether claimants' refusal of defendant's offer to carry out remedial works preventing recovery of damages.
Building contract Damages for breach. It was unreasonable for a party to a dispute as to proposed remedial works to refuse to allow surveyors to meet to discuss their differences, especially if the costs thereof were to be underwritten by the other side. In relation to a refusal of the original contractor's continuing offer to carry out remedial works, it would take a relatively extreme set of facts to deny a homeowner compensation for admitted defects and to leave him no option but to appoint that contractor to carry out the remedial work.
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary