||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 26 (Jun)
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Thorpe, Arden LJJ and Hedley J
||Carolyn Jones for the claimant.
||The defendant appeared in person.
||6 June 2007
Practice - Family proceedings - Committal applications - Committal and contact applications - Final care order putting child in care of maternal grandmother - Mother seeking contact - Mother being unrepresented - Mother committed for breaches of court order and sentenced to immediate custodial sentence - Whether judge erring in not giving mother opportunity to obtain legal representation - Whether judge erring in not giving mother opportunity to make submissions on sentence.
Practice Family proceedings. In family proceedings involving a contact dispute, where the defendant mother had been committed for breaches of a court order after suspended and immediate sentences of imprisonment for earlier breaches, the judge had been justified in proceeding with the case without giving the defendant an opportunity to obtain legal representation, given the defendant's refusals to obtain representation in the past. The defendant had, however, not been given an opportunity to address matters as to sentencing, and those matters would be considered afresh. In all the circumstances, although the judge had been entitled to impose an immediate sentence of imprisonment, the sentence would be reduced somewhat to enable the defendant's immediate release, either through the substitution of a shorter term, or simply through an order for her immediate release.
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary