||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 221 (Jun)
|| EWCA Civ 583
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Pill, Longmore and Jacob LJJ
||Justin Turner and Miles Copeland (instructed by Clarkslegal LLP) for the claimants.
||Desmond Browne QC and Jonathan Barnes (instructed by DWF) for the defendant.
||20 June 2007
Injunction - Interim - Trade mark infringement - Claimants seeking prior restraint order in trade mark infringement proceedings to prevent defendant publishing comparative advertisement disparaging claimants' product - Defendant intending to justify claims in advertisement at trial - Whether prior restraint order should be granted only if claims obviously untruthful and libellous - Whether prior restraint order should be granted only if claimants more likely than not to succeed at trial - , s 12(3).
Injunction Interim. The rule applicable to defamation or malicious falsehood claims, that no prior restraint orders would be granted where the defendant said that he was going to justify it at the trial of the action unless the statement was obviously untruthful and libellous, was not appropriate to trade mark infringement, even in a case of comparative advertising. Pursuant to s12(3) of the a man who found his trade mark disparaged by a rival trader in a comparative advertisement could obtain a prior restraining order only if he could show that it was more likely than not that the disparagement was wrong and misleading. Unless he could do that, then his rival, both for his commercial interests and in the interests of the public, ought to be free to say that which he honestly believed.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary