||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 106 (Sep)
Nicholas Strauss QC sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court
||Nathan Wells (instructed by Wilsons) for the claimant.
||The defendant did not appear and was not represented.
||22 September 2006
Easement - Right of way - Disturbance - Remedy - Track running between properties of parties - Claimants asserting right of way over track - Defendant obstructing track with vehicle - Defendant erecting gates on track - Whether claimants having right of way - Whether defendant's interference being actionable.
In a case where the claimants sought a declaration that they had a legal right of way over a track running between their property and that of the defendant, and further, they would be granted relief against the defendant's interference with that right as they had established that they were entitled to use the track as a legal easement.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary