||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 159 (Oct)
||Court of Appeal, Criminal Division
Simon and Lloyd Jones JJ
||Martin Callery (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the first defendant.
||Damian Powell (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the second defendant.
||Nicholas Worsley (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown.
||13 October 2006
Sentence - Imprisonment - Length of sentence - Handling stolen goods - Car ringing - Vehicles stolen to order and parts used to enhance value of legitimate cars - Value of vehicles stolen - Guilty pleas - Whether sentence manifestly excessive in all circumstances.
In the instant case, where the defendants had been involved in handling stolen vehicles which had been stolen to order, and stripping those vehicles in order to enhance the value of other, legitimate vehicles, in all the circumstances, and having regard to the aggravating features and the defendants' guilty pleas, the sentences of four years' imprisonment were manifestly excessive and would be reduced to three years' imprisonment.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary