||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 380 (Oct)
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Wall and Lloyd LJJ
||Martin Scott (instructed by Williams & Co) for the claimant.
||Catherine Ellis (instructed by Rawal & Co) for the defendant.
||31 October 2006
Contempt of court - Breach of court order - Non-molestation order - Committal - Judge imposing immediate custodial sentence for ten breaches - Whether judge erring in refusing to impose suspended sentence - Whether sentence manifestly excessive.
The judge had been entitled to impose an immediate custodial sentence on a defendant who had breached a non-molestation order ten times, where the defendant had, inter alia, made threats to the claimant, both to her face and in a note; had slashed the tyres of her mother's car; and had shouted encouragement to his current wife as she fought the claimant. The total sentence of 12 months' imprisonment was, however, too long, in all the circumstances. It would be reduced to one of eight months' imprisonment.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary