||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 231 (Apr)
||Court of Appeal, Criminal Division
Hooper LJ, Leveson and Beatson JJ
||Michael Chambers (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the defendant.
||Andrew Espley (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown.
||26 April 2006
Criminal evidence - Character of accused - Previous conviction - Using a false instrument with intent - Attempting to obtain a money transfer by deception - Judge admitting previous convictions for offences committed after instant offence as relevant to propensity - Whether previous convictions for subsequent offences could be admitted as going to propensity - Whether convictions unsafe.
Where bad character evidence was adduced under s101(1)(d) and s103(1)(a), as being relevant to propensity, the question the jury had to concentrate on was whether the defendant had propensity to commit offences of the kind alleged at the time of the alleged instant offence. There was, however, no justification for saying, as a matter of law, that the jury was not entitled to determine propensity at the time of the alleged instant offence, by considering offences committed afterwards. Whether or not the later offences helped in determining propensity was quintessentially a matter for the jury.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary