||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 165 (Apr)
|| EWHC 825 (Ch)
David Richards J
||Patrick Talbot QC and Andrew de la Rosa (instructed by Flint Bishop & Barnett) for the claimants.
||Grant Crawford (instructed by SGC Solicitors) for the first and second defendants.
||Thomas Dumont (instructed by Berryman Shacklock LLP) for the third defendant.
||11 April 2006
Administration of estates - Grant of administration - Practice - Grant revoked by consent - Costs of application - Evidence in support of application for grant - Lack of notice of application or grant - Procedure to be adopted on applications to probate registries under Non-Contentious Probate Rules 1987, .
The grant of letters of administration should not have been made without notice in the instant case. There was no requirement that the application, still less the grant, be made without notice. On the contrary the Non-Contentious Probate Rules 1987, made provision for notice to be given in an appropriate case.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary