||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 379 (Nov)
|| EWHC 2706 (Ch)
||Nicholas Le Poidevin (instructed by Brabners Chaffe Street, Liverpool) for the claimants.
||The first defendant appeared in person.
||Mark Hubbard (instructed by Paris Smith & Randall LLP, Southampton) for the third to seventh defendants.
||29 November 2005
Trust and trustee - Powers of trustee - Advancement - Charitable donation - Benefit of beneficiary - Discharge of moral obligation to make donation to charity - Whether proposed transaction for benefit of beneficiary.
It was not open to the trustees of a marriage settlement to exercise their powers of revocation and re-appointment in such a way as to release a very substantial part of the trust capital to the life tenant who was the wife of the settlor for the purpose of enabling her to devote it to charitable causes. Although the power could in principle (as a matter of construction) be exercised by advancing money to or for the benefit of the wife so that she might discharge a moral obligation to charity the transaction actually proposed could not properly be said to be for her benefit.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary