Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2005] All ER (D) 209 (Nov)
Court: Chancery Division

Patten J

Representation The appellant appeared in person.
  Michael Tappin (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the respondent.
Judgment Dates: 16 November 2005


Patent - Application - Refusal - Invention - Deputy director holding that invention incapable of industrial application - Whether deputy director correct.

The Case

The deputy director's decision that the appellant's invention was not capable of industrial application was clearly right and not open to challenge.

Practice Areas

If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.