||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 232 (Nov)
|| EWHC 2575 (Ch)
||Andrew Mitchell QC and Peter Irvin (instructed by Healys) for the claimants.
||Robert Leonard (instructed by Engleharts, Hove) for the first defendant.
||17 November 2005
Practice - Adjournment of proceedings - Inherent power of court to adjourn proceedings - Trial - Preliminary issue - Whether first defendant entitled to adjournment.
The court dismissed the first defendant's further application for an adjournment on the ground that the application was an attempt, without any cause, to sabotage an early trial of the preliminary issue of whether the first defendant was party to the killing of R. The application was hopeless and an abuse of process.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary