||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 333 (Nov)
|| EWCA Crim 3001
||Court of Appeal, Criminal Division
Hooper LJ, Jack J and Judge Gordon
||Philip Katz QC and Alexandra Ward (instructed by Fosters Solicitors) for the defendant.
||William Coker QC and Christopher Morgan (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown.
||24 November 2005
Criminal evidence - Trial - Witness - Murder - Cause of death - Expert evidence - Purpose of post-mortem reports - Whether evidence that particular finding being consistent with a conclusion having probative value.
A review of the development and bases of the prosecution expert's views and evidence that the victim had been smothered by the defendant established first that his conclusions were not founded in such a way that they could be safely relied on by the jury, and second, that the way that his evidence had been presented, the points which he had made, and the manner of making them, might well have caused the jury to have given inappropriate weight to aspects of his evidence. Accordingly, the defendant's conviction for murder was unsafe.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary