||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 402 (Nov)
||Court of Appeal, Criminal Division
Hooper LJ, Tugendhat J and Sir Douglas Brown
||Tony Stanford (assigned by the Registrar for Criminal Appeals) for the defendant.
||30 November 2005
Sentence - Imprisonment - Length of sentence - Theft - Whether sentence manifestly excessive.
On an appeal against sentence following the defendant's guilty plea to eight offences of theft, the court held that, having regard to the applicable sentencing guidelines, the sentence of 30 months' imprisonment was manifestly excessive and would be quashed. A sentence of 18 months' imprisonment would be substituted.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary