||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 306 (Nov)
||Court of Appeal, Criminal Division
Rose LJ, Simon and Dobbs JJ
||Robin Shellard (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the defendant.
||Michael Longman (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown.
||23 November 2005
Sentence - Imprisonment - Length of sentence - Causing or inciting a person, with a mental disorder impeding choice, to engage in sexual activity - Whether adult complainant comparable to child - Whether sentence manifestly excessive - , s 31.
In the instant case, where the defendant had been convicted of causing or inciting a person, with a mental disorder impeding choice, to engage in sexual activity, contrary to s31 of the the sentence of three years' imprisonment was manifestly excessive and would be quashed. A period of 15months would be substituted. The court declined to give specific sentencing guidance on cases involving such offences, commenting that each case depended on its own facts. However, the fact that a complainant in such offences had no capacity to refuse sexual activity meant that offences of the kind in the instant case could be compared, depending on the circumstances, to offences against children.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary