||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 281 (Nov)
||Court of Appeal, Criminal Division
Hallett LJ, Hodge J and the Recorder of Chester
||Ben Compton (instructed by Morgan Cole) for the defendant.
||David Bright (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown.
||22 November 2005
Criminal evidence - Trial - Witness - Obtaining a money transfer by deception - Making a false representation to procure a cremation - Evidence called by witness in rebuttal of defendant's assertion - Evidence going to credibility of defendant - Witness subsequently admitting perjury in relation to evidence - Whether convictions unsafe.
In the instant case, evidence in rebuttal (relating to the defendant's credibility) from a prosecution witness who subsequently admitted perjury in relation to his evidence affected the safety of the conviction for obtaining a money transfer by deception as it had gone to the central issue of honesty. However, the issues were different in relation to two counts of making a false representation to procure a cremation, and the convictions were not affected by the witness's evidence.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary