|| All ER (D) 264 (Nov)
||Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
||Shivani Jegarajah (instructed by Hammersmith Law Centre) for the claimant.
||Parishil Patel (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State.
||21 November 2005
Immigration - Asylum seeker - Fresh claim - New evidence to support claim - Proper test - Whether new evidence amounting to fresh claim - Immigration Rules 1999, r 353.
Having regard to r353 of the Immigration Rules 1999, a fresh asylum claim based on new evidence should be rejected as such only if it was intrinsically not credible or if one could say, looking at the case as a whole, no one could reasonably believe it.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary