||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 168 (Dec)
|| EWHC 2850 (Admin)
||Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
||Alan Masters (instructed by Community Law Partnership) for the claimant.
||Timothy Mould (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State.
||14 November 2005
Town and country planning - Appeal to Minister against refusal of permission for development - Notification of decision - Reasons for decision - Secretary of State not agreeing with recommendation of inspector - Refusal of permission for development - Whether Secretary of State reaching conclusions of fact requiring further representations - Whether Secretary of State making irrational decision - Town and Country Planning (Inquiries Procedure) (England) Rules 2000, r 17.
The defendant Secretary of State had not failed to comply with r17(5) of the Town and Country Planning Inquiry Procedure (England) Rules 2000 in that the existence of the local education authority's (LEA) legal obligations, which the Secretary of State relied upon in finding that the effect on the education of the claimant's children of a refusal of planning permission for a caravan site for gypsies had not constituted a very special circumstance, was not something which required any fresh representation.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary