||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 211 (Nov)
|| EWHC 2438 (QB)
||Queen's Bench Division
||Claire Miskin (instructed by Osmond & Osmond) for the claimant.
||Sara Mansoori (instructed by Wragge & Co LLP) for the defendants.
||8 November 2005
Libel and slander - Qualified privilege - Public interest - Election - Words published on occasion material to question in issue in the election - Protection of candidate's Convention rights - Whether plea of qualified privilege barred by statute - , s 10 - , Sch 1, arts 6, 10.
In light of the provisions of the and certain of the Convention rights, s10 of the was to be interpreted as meaning that a candidate at a Parliamentary or local election could not claim a special privilege by virtue only of publishing words that were material to a question in issue in the election. On the other hand, a candidate, like any other citizen, might be able to establish a defence of qualified privilege if the ingredients recognised at common law were present on the facts of the case.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary