|Source:||All England Reporter|
|Publisher Citation:|| All ER (D) 73 (Nov)|
|Representation||The applicant appeared in person.|
|Michael Tappin (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the respondent.|
|Judgment Dates:||4 November 2005|
Patent - Application - Examination of application - Lack of novelty and inventive step - Deputy director holding that invention as claimed no more than method of doing business or presentation of information and did not make technical contribution - Whether deputy director in error.