||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 167 (Mar)
||Employment Appeal Tribunal
Judge McMullen QC
||Peter Goodbody (instructed by Ricksons, Preston) for the first employee.
||Peter Goodbody (instructed by DLA, Liverpool) for the second employee.
||Matthew Smith (instructed by Halliwells LLP, Manchester) for the employer.
||3 November 2005
Employment - Contract of service - Legality - Provision calculated to deceive revenue authorities - Employer raising defence to claims for unfair dismissal that contracts tainted by illegality - Whether employment tribunal chairman entitled to find contract not illegal and tribunal having jurisdiction to hear substantive claims.
It was settled law that in cases where the contract of employment was neither entered into for an illegal purpose not prohibited by statute, the illegal performance of the contract would not render the contract unenforceable unless, in addition to knowledge of the facts which made performance illegal, the employee actually participated in the illegal performance. The central question was therefore whether there was not simply knowledge but also participation.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary