||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 145 (Nov)
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Scott Baker and Neuberger JJ
||Christina Michalos (instructed by the Pro Bono Unit) for the claimant.
||Stuart Nicol (instructed by Rohan & Co) for the defendant.
||10 November 2005
Costs - Order for costs - Discretion - Whether judge taking irrelevant matters into account - Whether costs award excessive.
On the claimant's appeal against a costs order in an action involving infringement of copyright which had been allocated to the fast track, the court allowed the appeal and made no order as to costs in circumstances where it was satisfied that the judge had erred in the exercise of his discretion.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary