||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 387 (Nov)
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Judge, Latham and Hallett LJJ
||Tim Buley (instructed by Duncan Lewis & Co) for the claimant.
||Robin Tam (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State.
||29 November 2005
Immigration - Leave to enter - Refusal of leave - Appeal - Adjudicator finding removal amounting to disproportionate interference with right to respect for private and family life - Immigration Appeal Tribunal finding removal not contrary to claimant's human rights - Whether adjudicator applying correct test - Whether appeal tribunal dealing adequately with adjudicator's decision - , Sch 1, Pt 1, art 8.
Where both the decision of the adjudicator and the decision of the Immigration Appeal Tribunal had been flawed, the claimant's appeal, concerning whether his removal would be a disproportionate interference with his right to private and family life pursuant to art8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, would be remitted to a tribunal for reconsideration.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary