||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 300 (Apr)
Brooke LJ and David Steel J
||Julian Coningham of Coninghams Solicitors, Twickenham for the claimant.
||John Hardy (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the interested party.
||21 April 2005
Administrative law - Natural justice - Fair hearing - Bias - District judge.
In determining whether or not there was an appearance of bias, there was no fine distinction turning on whether or not there was a plea of guilty. In the instant case, there had been an appearance of bias in the procedure. The court added per curiam that there was a need for a protocol ensuring that judges accused of bias in the magistrates' courts received representation when the accusation was heard in the High Court.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary