||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 357 (Feb)
|| EWCA Civ 175
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Kennedy, Clarke and Wall LJJ
||Lord Brennan QC, Andrew Spink and Richard Hermer (instructed by Leigh Day & Co) for the claimant.
||Michael Beloff QC, Charles Pugh and Ben Cooper (instructed by Manches) for the defendant.
||20 February 2004
Negligence - Duty of care - Proximity - Report into potability of ground water in Bangladesh - Existence of duty of care.
In the circumstances of the case, there was not a relationship of sufficient proximity so as to give rise to a duty of care between the defendant, which had published a report into the potability of ground water in parts of Bangladesh, and the claimant, who alleged that he had suffered arsenic poisoning as a result of drinking such water. Accordingly, on appeal, the action was struck out.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary