||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 257 (May)
||Employment Appeal Tribunal
Judge Birtles, Mr A Tuffin and Mrs D Whittingham
||20 May 2003
Employment - Unfair dismissal - Compensation - Calculation - Employee's duty to mitigate - Employee having second job - Tribunal reducing employee's award of compensation due to second job - Correctness of tribunal's approach - Employment Rights Act 1996, s 123(4).
The common law duty to mitigate loss, provided for in the field of unfair dismissal by s123(4) of the Employment Rights Act1996, could not operate so as to enable a tribunal to reduce compensation payable where the dismissed employee had had another job to that in respect of which he was claiming unfair dismissal. The duty to mitigate loss under s123(4) of the Act had to apply only to employment which commenced after dismissal. To do otherwise would be to unjustly reward an employer for dismissing an employee who had the initiative and energy to have had alternative employment which predated the dismissal.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary