||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 279 (May)
|| UKPC 38
Lord Hope of Craighead, Lord Hobhouse of Woodborough, Lord Millett, Lord Scott of Foscote and Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe
||J Sumption QC, R Craddock QC and B Latimer (both of the New Zealand Bar) (instructed by DLA) for the appellants.
||R Harrison QC and G Illingworth (of the New Zealand Bar) (instructed by Cruikshanks) for the Law Society.
||20 May 2003
Practice and procedure - Disclosure - Privilege - Legal professional privilege - Principle of legal professional privilege overriding statutory power to request production of privileged documents - New Zealand Law Practitioners Act 1982, s 101(3).
On an appeal from a judgment of the New Zealand Court of Appeal that s101(3) of the New Zealand Law Practitioners Act 1982, which gave the respondent law society power to call for documents from practitioners under investigation overrode any claim to legal professional privilege, the Privy Council held that legal professional privilege was a good answer to requisition under the Act, since that was where Parliament had struck the balance between the public interest in the maintenance of the integrity of the legal profession, and the public interest in the administration of justice.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary