Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2003] All ER (D) 213 (Feb)
Neutral Citation: [2003] EWCA Civ 166
Court: Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Judge:

Schiemann, Mummery and Dyson LJJ

Representation Duran Seddon (instructed by Browell Smith & Co) for the claimant.
  David Forsdick (instructed by the Solicitor for the Department of Work and Pensions) for the Secretary of State.
Judgment Dates: 14 February 2003

Catchwords

Social security - Industrial injuries benefit - Entitlement - Determination of date of onset of disease - Finality of decisions - s 60.

The Case

Parliament intended finality to be the rule where the question was whether a person was suffering from a prescribed disease for the purposes of a claim for industrial injuries benefit. That was so whether that question arose in the context of a claim for disablement benefit or reduced earnings allowance. It followed that a tribunal could not decide that a claimant first began to suffer from a loss of faculty as a result of the prescribed disease during a period in relation to which it had already been decided that he did not suffer from the prescribed disease in question.

Practice Areas

If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.