||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 08 (Feb)
||Michael Silverleaf QC (instructed by Stephenson Harwood) for the claimant.
||Guy Burkill QC (instructed by Wragge & Co) for the defendant.
||Daniel Alexander (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the registrar.
||3 February 2003
Trade mark - Registration - Revocation for 'non-use' - Registrar concluding that evidence put in by claimant insufficient to establish genuine use - Application to adduce further evidence on appeal.
Proceedings before the Registrar of Trade Marks were not be treated as a 'dry run', with the correction of evidential deficiencies being rectified on appeal, as was increasingly the case.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary