||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 406 (Feb)
|| UKHL 10
||House of Lords
Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead, Lord Lloyd of Berwick, Lord Hutton, Lord Hobhouse of Woodborough and Lord Rodger of Earlsferry
||Andrew Edis QC and Arthur Gibson (instructed by Bell Lamb Joynson) for the defendant.
||David Perry and Duncan Penny (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown.
||27 February 2003
Criminal law - Murder - Defence - Diminished responsibility - Defendant suffering from abnormality of mind - Defendant having taken drink before killing - Causative effect of drink not necessarily preventing abnormality of mind suffered by defendant from substantially impairing his mental responsibility - s 2(1).
Even if a defendant would not have killed if he had not taken drink, the causative effect of the drink did not necessarily prevent an abnormality of mind suffered by the defendant from substantially impairing his mental responsibility for his fatal acts.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary