||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 289 (Feb)
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Pill, Latham LJJ and Morland J
||Stephanie Harrison (instructed by Luqmani Thompson & Partners) for the applicant.
||Lisa Giovannetti (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State.
||20 February 2003
Immigration - Asylum - Refusal of application - Refusal in part on grounds of applicant presenting forged document - Where burden of proof that document forged lay.
The general approach in an asylum case was that where there was an apparently genuine document said to be a forgery, the evidential burden was on the Secretary of State to undermine the authenticity of that document. However, it was important to bear in mind the exercise on which the court or tribunal was engaged. In the instant case, a special adjudicator had been correct in his reasoning that an identity card which was patently flawed and apparently not genuine could be used to support his reasoning that he did not believe the applicant's case.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary