||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 184 (Sep)
|| EWCA Crim 2143
||Court of Appeal, Criminal Division
Latham LJ, Hunt and Davis JJ
||Sarah Ellis (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the defendant.
||Tayo Adebayo (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown.
||13 September 2002
Criminal law - Trial - Stay of proceedings - Being knowingly concerned in the fraudulent evasion of the prohibition on the importation of a controlled drug - Defendant claiming to have acted under duress from individual involved in criminal activities - Defendant applying for stay of proceedings in order to make fuller enquiries into individual - Judge declining to stay proceedings - Whether conviction safe.
Where the defendant had been convicted of being knowingly concerned in the fraudulent evasion of the prohibition on the importation of a controlled drug, despite his assertion that he had acted under duress, having been approached by another individual who had a reputation as a man of violence with significant involvement in criminal activities, the information disclosed to the defendant by the prosecution had enabled him fully and properly to support his assertion as to the other individual's reputation and his conviction had not been unsafe.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary