||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 139 (Sep)
||European Court of Human Rights
Judges Pellonpää (President), Bratza, Pastor Ridruejo, Palm, Maruste, Pavlovschi, Garlicki and Mr M O'Boyle (Section Registrar)
||24 September 2002
Human rights - Fair hearing - Criminal offence - Right to interpreter - Applicant charged with criminal offences - Applicant alleging lack of proficiency in English language - Judge not providing applicant with interpreter - Whether violation of right to fair hearing - European Convention on Human Rights, arts 6(1), 6(3)(e).
Where the applicant had pleaded guilty to serious charges and faced a heavy prison sentence and the judge had failed to reassure himself that the absence of an interpreter at the sentencing hearing would not prejudice the applicant's full involvement in a matter of crucial importance for him, there had been a violation of art6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights taken in conjunction with art6(3)(e).
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary