||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 186 (Oct)
|| EWHC 2033 (Comm)
David Steel J
||Graham Dunning QC and Ricky Diwan (instructed by Stephenson Harwood) for the claimant.
||Michael Howard QC and Karen Troy-Davies (instructed by Brookes & Co) for the defendant.
||14 October 2002
Conflict of laws - Jurisdiction - Convention jurisdiction - Charterparty - Law governing arbitration clause - Availability of anti-suit injunction - (Applicable Law) Act 1990, Sch 1, art 8(2).
In an action based on a charterparty, an argument by the claimant to rely on the law of the Ukraine and-or Switzerland to establish that it did not consent to the incorporation of the London arbitration clause by virtue of art8(2) of the Rome Convention was dismissed; and, further, the defendant obtained an anti-suit injunction to restrain the claimant from pursuing proceedings otherwise than by arbitration.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary