||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 448 (Oct)
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Schiemann, Arden and Dyson LJJ
||Simon Mortimore QC (instructed by Holmes Hardingham) for the creditor.
||Richard Jones QC (instructed by Tarlo Lyons) for the debtor.
||Charles Hollander QC (instructed by the Bar Council) as intervenor.
||30 October 2002
Barristers - Professional conduct - Objection to participation of other party's counsel in proceedings - Inherent power of court to prevent abuse procedure - Power of court to restrain advocate from representing a party if satisfied that real risk that continued participation would lead to order made at trial being set aside on appeal.
Where a party objected to an advocate representing his opponent, that party had no right to prevent the advocate from acting based on the Code of Conduct, as the content and enforcement of the Code were not a matter for the court. However, the court had an inherent power to prevent abuse of its procedure, and accordingly had the power to restrain an advocate from representing a party if it was satisfied that there was a real risk that his continued participation would lead to a situation where the order made at trial would have to be set aside on appeal.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary