||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 65 (Oct)
Latham LJ and McCombe J
||Clair Dobbin (instructed by Tuckers) for the applicant.
||John Jones (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the respondent.
||7 October 2002
Extradition - Discharge of fugitive - Circumstances rendering it unjust or oppressive to return fugitive - Youth of fugitive - Fugitive 17 years old when charged with attempted murder - Fugitive escaping to United Kingdom - Fugitive starting education and having family - Extradition requested six years' after commission of offences - Whether oppressive to return fugitive - s 11(3).
Balancing the seriousness of the offences with which the applicant had been charged against the applicant's young age, there was nothing in the delay in the applicant's extradition, notwithstanding that he had married and now had a child, that would make it oppressive to return him. Accordingly, the application for a writ of habeas corpus would be dismissed.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary