||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 507 (Oct)
|| EWCA Crim 2427
||Court of appeal, Criminal Division
Potter LJ, Butterfield J and Judge Findlay Baker
||Wayne Cleaver (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the defendant.
||Tony Docking (instructed by Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown.
||24 October 2002
Jury - Verdict - Inconsistent verdict - No logical inconsistency as between verdicts.
The test whether or not verdicts were inconsistent required it to be shown that no jury, reasonably applying their mind to the facts of the case, could have arrived at the conclusion which they had. In the instant case, the defendant had made admissions in respect of one incident which formed the basis of one count, but had made no admissions in respect of a further incident which had formed the basis of the second count. Accordingly, it could not be said that the verdicts were inconsistent.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary