||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 270 (Oct)
|| EWHC 2097 (Admin)
||Donald Gordon (instructed by Mangala & Co) for the claimant.
||Lisa Giovanetti (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the defendant.
||18 October 2002
Asylum - Removal of certain persons unlawfully in the United Kingdom - Removal directions - Validity of removal directions - Immigration Asylum Act 1999, s 69(5).
For the purposes of an appeal under s69(5) of the Immigration Act 1999, the validity of the removal directions had to be assumed. According, the removal directions which the immigration officer had given the claimant in the instant case, had to be treated by the adjudicator on appeal under s69(5) as valid in the absence of a separate appeal challenging their validity. He therefore had not erred when he failed to hold that there was not a valid appeal under s69(5) before him.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary