||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 123 (Oct)
||Chima Umezuruike (instructed by Andrews) for the claimant.
||Iain Purvis (instructed by Frank Forney & Partners) for the defendants.
||9 October 2002
Practice - Pre-trial or post judgment relief - Freezing order - Claimant applying for continuation of freezing order - Whether freezing order should be continued.
The claimant's application for a continuation of the freezing order against the first and second defendants, was allowed on the grounds that the claimant had an arguable case for breach of trust and deceit, and his proprietary interest in the property needed to be protected until trial.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary