Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2002] All ER (D) 123 (Oct)
Court: Chancery Division
Judge:

Rimer J

Representation Chima Umezuruike (instructed by Andrews) for the claimant.
  Iain Purvis (instructed by Frank Forney & Partners) for the defendants.
Judgment Dates: 9 October 2002

Catchwords

Practice - Pre-trial or post judgment relief - Freezing order - Claimant applying for continuation of freezing order - Whether freezing order should be continued.

The Case

The claimant's application for a continuation of the freezing order against the first and second defendants, was allowed on the grounds that the claimant had an arguable case for breach of trust and deceit, and his proprietary interest in the property needed to be protected until trial.

If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.