||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 403 (Oct)
||Technology and Construction Court
Judge Anthony Thornton QC
||Finola O'Farrell QC (instructed by Rosling King) for the claimant.
||Robert Clay (instructed by Rosenblatt) for the defendant.
||4 October 2002
Deeds - Interpretation of deed - Warranty under seal - Retrospective effect of cause of action under deed - Date from which time running.
A contract or a deed, being a contract under seal, could take effect retrospectively when that was the intention (express or implied) of the parties and when such retrospectivity was not precluded by law. Parties could therefore agree that any cause of action was to accrue from a date earlier than the contract or deed, and, in such circumstances, time, for limitation purposes, would run from the date that the breach of contract occurred. A pre-existing contractual relationship between the parties prior to the contract or deed in question was not a pre-requisite to giving the latter instrument retrospective effect.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary