||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 490 (Oct)
|| EWHC 2349 (Admin)
||Robert McCracken (instructed by Steele & Co, Norwich) for the claimant.
||Paul Brown (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the defendant.
||10 October 2002
Town and country planning - Planning permission - Conditional permission - Variation of conditions - Refusal to vary - Appeal - Reasonableness of decision.
The Secretary of State's planning inspector had not erred in refusing to vary a condition requiring a hot food take away to close between midnight and 11.30am, and had been entitled to conclude that an extension in opening hours would be likely to result in an unacceptable increase in noise and disturbance.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary